Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Attorney Steve® Blog

Factors courts consider before awarding attorneys fees in copyright infringement matters

Posted by Steve Vondran | Jun 17, 2021 | 0 Comments

Attorney Steve® Copyright Law Essentials - Fee Shifting in Infringement Matters - Factors to Review

fee shifting in copyright cases

Introduction

In Plan Pros and Prime Designs, Inc. vs. Dultmeir Homes (architectural infringement case), the Court discussed the factors a Court will consider in a copyright infringement action to determine if they will EXERCISE THEIR DISCRETION and award attorney fees to the prevailing party in the litigation.  This could be either the Plaintiff if they were the prevailing party, or a Defendant may recover attorney fees in copyright cases if they prevail. (for example if a fair use defense wins the day).

The Kirtsaeng Case

In Kirtsaeng, the court recognized that the objective reasonableness of the losing side's position is entitled to significant or substantial, but not controlling, weight in accounting for all relevant factors. Id. at 1988-89. The Court explained: As we recognized in Fogerty, § 505 confers broad discretion on district courts and, in deciding whether to fee-shift, they must take into account a range of considerations beyond the reasonableness of litigating positions.  

The four, non-exhaustive factors to consider:

(1) frivolousness

(2) motivation

(3) objective unreasonableness

and

(4) the need in particular circumstances to advance considerations of compensation and deterrence

That means in any given case a court may award fees even though the losing party offered reasonable arguments (or, conversely, deny fees even though the losing party made unreasonable ones).

For example, a court may order fee-shifting because of a party's litigation misconduct, whatever the reasonableness of his claims or defenses. See, e.g., Viva Video, Inc. v. Cabrera, 9 Fed.Appx. 77, 80 (C.A.2 2001).

Or a court may do so to deter repeated instances of copyright infringement or overaggressive assertions of copyright claims, again even if the losing position was reasonable in a particular case. See, e.g., Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. WB Music Corp., 520 F.3d 588, 593–595 (C.A.6 2008) (awarding fees against a copyright holder who filed hundreds of suits on an overbroad legal theory, including in a subset of cases in which it was objectively reasonable).

Although objective reasonableness carries significant weight, courts must view all the circumstances of a case on their own terms, in light of the Copyright Act's essential goals. Kirtsaeng, 136 S. Ct. at 1988–89. 

Contact a California and Arizona IP law firm

If you need help with a copyright infringement matter or a broadcast law issue dealing with the Telecom Act, call us to discuss your case at (877) 276-5084.  Since 2004 we have been fighting for both corporations and individuals in a wide variety of intellectual property, social media, and entertainment law legal matters.  You can also fill out the contact form and we will contact you.

About the Author

Steve Vondran

Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise indicated. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Call us at (877) 276-5084. AZ Bar Lic. #025911 CA. Bar Lic. #232337

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!
The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran, P.C. BBB Business Review

Menu