Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Boxing PPV Piracy

Our intellectual property law firm helps companies and individuals being charged with PPV boxing fight theft – cable or satellite TV piracy cases.  Joe Hand Promotions | J&J Sports | G&G Closed Circuit and Innovative Sports Management, dba Integrated Sports Media.  Call us if you received a demand letter or phone call from an attorney.  (877) 276-5084.

boxing piracy defense law firm

 

September 2023 Boxing piracy updates:  J&J Sports is still going after infringers in various states.  We have helped many clients (from small mom-and-pops to hig end night clubs) settle their disputes quickly, effectively and anonymously in many cases.  There is also continuing action from the Thomas Riley Law Firm in Pasadena.  You may receive a phone call demanding payment of 20k, or even 40k (as our past clients have told us).  These are NOT fun phone calls.  Before you ever pay a demand like this out of fear, call us to discuss your case, and to discuss what potential DEFAULT JUDGMENTS are in our federal court district.  In our opinion, they are seriously hoping you won't look into this because it could drastically reduce the settlement amount.  Call us for more details.

Click here for important information about settlement demands from G&G Closed Circuit Events

September 2022 Updates:  We have our ear to the ground and there are "rumblings" that Joe Hand Promotions will be filing lawsuits over PPV theft in California.  Call us for a no-cost initial consultation if you receive the "love letter" as we call it.  We have helped many bars, restaurants, tattoo parlors, barber shops, and others resolve these matters.  (877) 276-5084.

Introduction

If you are running a bar, restaurant, tavern, nightclub or sports bar and you show the fight to your customers (which would be considered a “commercial” viewing requiring a commercial license) and yet you did not pay for the proper commercial license, you could find yourself on the receiving end of a knockout punch from a Plaintiff lawyer representing a company like Joe Hand Promotions or JJ Sports Production.

IMPORTANT:  IF YOU ARE BEING CALLED BY A BOXING PIRACY LAWYER SEEKING TO SETTLE YOUR CASE - THE FIRST STEP IS TO HANG UP THE PHONE!!!

What is Pay-Per-View boxing piracy?

When you receive a notice of infringement (often times demanding amounts from $20,000 to $100,000) things can get stressful, but understanding your legal rights and potential defenses can be very important to avoiding bankruptcy and responding to the legal demand.  As noted above, claims are usually raised due to showing a fight to your customers without first obtaining the proper commercial license (which naturally costs more, and which many small operations cannot afford).

Many times my clients were found out due to posting an advertisement for their establishment on social media websites like facebook (ex. “come see the big fight on Friday at Joes Bar”).  The company that holds the broadcasting rights can look you up and see if you have secured the proper commercial license and if not, they can send an investigator out to shoot videos or take pictures to have as evidence of infringement or illegal broadcasting.  Once this evidence is in and processed, Plaintiff counsel may decide its time to send you a letter and seek to settle your case, often for a large sum of money.

Law firms that may come after you with a demand letter (or phone call)

As noted above, you may receive a letter from the Law offices of Thomas P. Riley, P.C. (Pasadena law firm that has a lot of experience in these types of cases).  This firm can be difficult to deal with which makes it important to have legal counsel on your side.  Another firm is the Lonstein Law Office in New York and Jekielek  in Pennsylvania.

VIDEO - Overview of Integrated Sports Management boxing piracy cases

Integrated Sports Media defense

Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to join over 41,500 people who love our legal videos.

Causes of Action at Issue

Two federal code sections which may be cited in the demand letter.  Aside from potentially seeing a claim for federal copyright infringement (The Lonstein firm in New York does this) which is a potential third cause of action, here are the two other federal laws that you may be accused of violating (Section 605 and 553 of the Tele-communications Act):
 

(i) The Communications Act of 1934 – [Title 47 U.S.C. 605]

(a)  Practices prohibited Except as authorized by chapter 119, Title 18, no person receiving, assisting in receiving, transmitting, or assisting in transmitting, any interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio shall divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning thereof, except through authorized channels of transmission or reception,

(1) to any person other than the addressee, his agent, or attorney,

(2) to a person employed or authorized to forward such communication to its destination,

(3) to proper accounting or distributing officers of the various communicating centers over which the communication may be passed,

(4) to the master of a ship under whom he is serving,

(5) in response to a subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction,

or

(6) on demand of other lawful authority. No person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any radio communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person. No person not being entitled thereto shall receive or assist in receiving any interstate or foreign communication by radio and use such communication (or any information therein contained) for his own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto. No person having received any intercepted radio communication or having become acquainted with the contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such communication (or any part thereof) knowing that such communication was intercepted, shall divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such communication (or any part thereof) or use such communication (or any information therein contained) for his own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto.

This section shall not apply to the receiving, divulging, publishing, or utilizing the contents of any radio communication which is transmitted by any station for the use of the general public, which relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles, or persons in distress, or which is transmitted by an amateur radio station operator or by a citizens band radio operator.

Definitions under 47 U.S.C. 605

(d)  Definitions For purposes of this section–

(1) the term “satellite cable programming” means video programming which is transmitted via satellite and which is primarily intended for the direct receipt by cable operators for their retransmission to cable subscribers;

(2) the term “agent”, with respect to any person, includes an employee of such person;

(3) the term “encrypt”, when used with respect to satellite cable programming, means to transmit such programming in a form whereby the aural and visual characteristics (or both) are modified or altered for the purpose of preventing the unauthorized receipt of such programming by persons without authorized equipment which is designed to eliminate the effects of such modification or alteration;

(4) the term “private viewing” means the viewing for private use in an individual's dwelling unit by means of equipment, owned or operated by such individual, capable of receiving satellite cable programming directly from a satellite;

(5) the term “private financial gain” shall not include the gain resulting to any individual for the private use in such individual's dwelling unit of any programming for which the individual has not obtained authorization for that use; and

(6) the term “any person aggrieved” shall include any person with proprietary rights in the intercepted communication by wire or radio, including wholesale or retail distributors of satellite cable programming, and, in the case of a violation of paragraph (4) of subsection (e) of this section, shall also include any person engaged in the lawful manufacture, distribution, or sale of equipment necessary to authorize or receive satellite cable programming.

Penalties for violation of 47 U.S.C. 605

(e)  Penalties; civil actions; remedies; attorney's fees and costs; computation of damages; regulation by State and local authorities

(1) Any person who willfully violates subsection (a) of this section shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months, or both.

(2) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section willfully and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both, for the first such conviction and shall be fined not more than $100,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for any subsequent conviction.

(3) (A) Any person aggrieved by any violation of subsection (a) of this section or paragraph (4) of this subsection may bring a civil action in a United States district court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction.

(B) The court–

(i) may grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of subsection (a) of this section;

(ii) may award damages as described in subparagraph (C);

and

(iii) shall direct the recovery of full costs, including awarding reasonable attorneys' fees to an aggrieved party who prevails.

(C) (i) Damages awarded by any court under this section shall be computed, at the election of the aggrieved party, in accordance with either of the following subclauses;

(I) the party aggrieved may recover the actual damages suffered by him as a result of the violation and any profits of the violator that are attributable to the violation which are not taken into account in computing the actual damages; in determining the violator's profits, the party aggrieved shall be required to prove only the violator's gross revenue, and the violator shall be required to prove his deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the violation; or

(II) the party aggrieved may recover an award of statutory damages for each violation of subsection (a) of this section involved in the action in a sum of not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000, as the court considers just, and for each violation of paragraph (4) of this subsection involved in the action an aggrieved party may recover statutory damages in a sum not less than $10,000, or more than $100,000, as the court considers just. (ii) In any case in which the court finds that the violation was committed willfully and for purposes of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain, the court in its discretion may increase the award of damages, whether actual or statutory, by an amount of not more than $100,000 for each violation of subsection (a) of this section. (iii) In any case where the court finds that the violator was not aware and had no reason to believe that his acts constituted a violation of this section, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of damages to a sum of not less than $250.

Don't forget, if you do not answer the complaint, a judge can award punitive damages

17 U.S.C. 553

(ii) The Cable & Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, – [Title 47 U.S.C. section 553]

(a)  Unauthorized interception or receipt or assistance in intercepting or receiving service; “assist in intercepting or receiving” defined

(1) No person shall intercept or receive or assist in intercepting or receiving any communications service offered over a cable system, unless specifically authorized to do so by a cable operator or as may otherwise be specifically authorized by law.

(2) For the purpose of this section, the term “assist in intercepting or receiving” shall include the manufacture or distribution of equipment intended by the manufacturer or distributor (as the case may be) for unauthorized reception of any communications service offered over a cable system in violation of subparagraph (1). (b)  Penalties for willful violation (1) Any person who willfully violates subsection (a)(1) of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than 6 months, or both. (2) Any person who violates subsection (a)(1) of this section willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both, for the first such offense and shall be fined not more than $100,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for any subsequent offense.

(3) For purposes of all penalties and remedies established for violations of subsection (a)(1) of this section, the prohibited activity established herein as it applies to each such device shall be deemed a separate violation. (c) Civil action in district court; injunctions; damages; attorney's fees and costs; regulation by States or franchising authorities (1) Any person aggrieved by any violation of subsection (a)(1) of this section may bring a civil action in a United States district court or in any other court of competent jurisdiction.

(2) The court may– (A) grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of subsection (a)(1) of this section;

(B) award damages as described in paragraph (3); and (C) direct the recovery of full costs, including awarding reasonable attorneys' fees to an aggrieved party who prevails. (3) (A) Damages awarded by any court under this section shall be computed in accordance with either of the following clauses: (i) the party aggrieved may recover the actual damages suffered by him as a result of the violation and any profits of the violator that are attributable to the violation which are not taken into account in computing the actual damages; in determining the violator's profits, the party aggrieved shall be required to prove only the violator's gross revenue, and the violator shall be required to prove his deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the violation; or (ii) the party aggrieved may recover an award of statutory damages for all violations involved in the action, in a sum of not less than $250 or more than $10,000 as the court considers just.

(B) In any case in which the court finds that the violation was committed willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, the court in its discretion may increase the award of damages, whether actual or statutory under subparagraph (A), by an amount of not more than $50,000. (C) In any case where the court finds that the violator was not aware and had no reason to believe that his acts constituted a violation of this section, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of damages to a sum of not less than $100.

(D) Nothing in this subchapter shall prevent any State or franchising authority from enacting or enforcing laws, consistent with this section, regarding the unauthorized interception or reception of any cable service or other communications service.

Overview of Potential Damages in Boxing Piracy PPV cases

and another

Can these cases be settled without a federal lawsuit being filed?

Yes.  Many cases are settled before costly litigation is forced to ensure.  Of course, you want to make sure you have an excellent IP firm fighting for you getting to seek the best possible settlement terms of settlement including the lowest amount. These are cases that are best left to experienced legal counsel familiar with boxing piracy cases, and who have built working relationships with the opposing counsel mentioned above. 

Call us at (877) 276-5084 for a no cost initial discussion.  We can help with cases filed in the Central District Court of California | Northern District of California | Eastern District of California Southern District of California | Flagstaff, Arizona federal court Phoenix, Arizona Federal Court and other courts across the country subject to local rules of admission.  We have been admitted in Texas and New York federal courts.

Important PPV Theft & Boxing Piracy Blogs by Vondran Legal

  1. Are the piracy investigators RUNNERS for the law firm?
  2. JJ SPORTS v. MADELL FAMILY VENTURES, LLC
  3. https://vondranlegal.com/pay-per-view-piracy-defense-attorneys/
  4. Overview of boxing piracy defense
  5. https://vondranlegal.com/defenses-in-j-j-sports-boxing-piracy-lawsuits/
  6. J&J Sports has sued many minority owned businesses
  7. The Internet Streaming Defense?
  8. The “trespasser” defense?
  9. The GOOD FAITH defense
  10. Joe Hand California lawsuits?

I got a letter for showing a Soccer Game (Innovation Sports - Law Offices of Tom Riley)

Here is more information on these types of Soccer PPV Piracy cases.  Also, another law firm busy in this area of law is Jekielek Janis Law Firm.

Attorney Steve® Tip: Important Podcast: Settlement Factors in Boxing Piracy Cases.

Copyright Law Video Resources

Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to our popular legal YouTube channel. We are now over 41,500 subscribers and growing fast!!

1.  Copyright Infringement Damages and Penalties Explained

2. What is a Motion to Quash a Subpoena to ISP?

3.  Overview of Boxing Piracy law

4.  Dealing with Boxing Copyright Trolls is no fun

5.  Copyright infringement defenses

Call us to discuss your case with a TV Signal Piracy Defense Law Firm

Our boutique intellectual property law firm can help your company if you are accused of illegally broadcasting copyrighted boxing or soccer matches. Companies that may pursue your company in this area of law include, but are not limited to:

  1. Zuffa, LLC
  2. Joe Hand Promotions
  3. Innovative Sports Management
  4. Premium Sports, Inc.
  5. GG&G Closed Circuit Events
  6. J&J Sports Productions

Contact a Boxing Piracy Defense Law Firm

Cases have been filed in California, Arizona, New York, Ohio, Illinois, D.C., Maryland, Texas and other states.  We can be reached at (877) 276-5084. 

In most cases, we are able to structure a low flat-rate legal fee (as opposed to what many law firms do, which is BILL BILL BILL). 

Call us for a free initial consultation.

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!
The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran, P.C. BBB Business Review

Menu