Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Attorney Steve® Blog

The Eagles “No photo” Policy – give me a break.

Posted by Steve Vondran | Aug 03, 2017 | 0 Comments

IP thought of the day – Is it legal to prohibit taking photos at a baseball game or concert?

Illegal photos and videos class action lawyer 1024x720

Introduction

I recently attended the “Classics” concert at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles.  Two of the headline bands were Fleetwood Mac and the Eagles.  This blog concerns the Eagles “no photos” policy and whether that is legal or not.

Here's how it went down, I scored some great tickets near center stage, VIP twelve rows back.  You could not have asked for a better seat.  When we purchased the tickets (approximately $1,700 each) we were not aware of any Eagles “no photo” policy, at least we did not recall seeing anything like that, and did not believe this formed the basis of the terms of the contract.

However, when we were seated a plethora of security started walking around the area and were telling everyone you cannot take photos of the Eagles (I suppose because you might actually get a good shot that you can keep and give to your kids one day).  So what happened is the band starts playing and next thing you know everyone is taking pictures and videotaping the show.

Now, I will concede that trying to post the video online may violate copyright laws (and maybe that's what they are trying to prevent) but this was not clear to most people who were sitting around us which leads me to believe this was not part of the ticket purchase (contract – you pay the fee, you get the seats).  It seemed like this was an “on the spot” policy unless somehow I am mistaken.

So the Eagles are playing their great songs, and people are pulling out their iPhones and Androids left and right and taking these shots of the band up close.  Meanwhile, security is all over the place essentially going crazy harassing people to put down their phones.  They were like a swarm of bees blocking the view and carrying out this policy that was apparently created by the Eagles.

In the final analysis, it ruined a good part of the act until the photos eventually died down about half way in, resulting in a non-enjoyable first half of the concert.  To me, this is a really stingy policy of the band preventing your fans from enjoying a peaceful show without a swarm of security running around like the “fun cops.”

At any rate, my wife asked me if this would create grounds for a class action lawsuit (against either the ticket company or other), and I told her I didn't know.  It seems like we didn't get the true benefit of our bargain as most people expect to be able to go to a concert and snap photos of our idols.  The fun cops (thanks to the Eagles policy) prevented us from enjoying a good part of their act.  At the prices that people paid all over the stadium, it makes me wonder if this is a good policy or not.  Whether it is a breach of contract or not.

At a minimum the Eagles should re-think their policy.  For me, Fleetwood Mac (who had no photo or video prohibitions) stole the show, and definitely are more likeable as they realize music fans pay good money for not only the show, but the experience, and the ability to take their favorite photos with them. Can you image going to a baseball game and the usher telling you to put your camera down?

Here is a link dealing with Mumford and Sons.  Just so you know guys, WE ARE THE FANS AND WE PAY THESE HIGH TICKET PRICES, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO WATCH THESE SHOWS THROUGH OUR CELL PHONES IF WE WANT TO.  DON'T FORGET THE CUSTOMER.

Just my thoughts for the day.

– Copyright Watchdog –

About the Author

Steve Vondran

Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise indicated. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Call us at (877) 276-5084. AZ Bar Lic. #025911 CA. Bar Lic. #232337

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!

Menu