Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Attorney Steve® Blog

The professional Copyright Plaintiff and the statute of limitations

Posted by Steve Vondran | Jul 31, 2023

Attorney Steve® Copyright Infringement Defenses - Statute of Limitations and the "professional Plaintiff tracker."

pirated bootleg storage device


There are many different types of Copyright plaintiffs who sue for unlawful and unlicensed use of their copyright-registered content.  For example, our firm has dealt with the following types of copyright defense brought by professional Plaintiff counsel.  When I say professional counsel, I mean the types of companies that use "phone home" or "call home" software to track and log unlicensed usage.  They do this day in and day out in an attempt to turn copyright infringement into a profit center.  Some examples include:

1.  Software companies (such as Ansys, Solidworks, Siemens, Autodesk, Flexera, Synopsis and others).

2.   Photo infringement Plaintiffs (more and more photographers are being encouraged to make a living in the infringement and pursuit of claims business).  These companies typically track infringements across the web every single day).

3.  BitTorrent file sharing of movies:  (ex. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC)

As Defense counsel, I often see claims being brought where the first detection of infringement was over 4 or 5 years ago.  I typically raise the statute of limitations defense only to hear "We just discovered the infringement and have no obligation to bring a case or a lawsuit earlier."  

I typically like to point out that this position may not be BULLETPROOF.  Let's take a look.

Statute of limitations for copyright infringement

The standard statute of limitations for copyright infringement claims is three years.  Most courts look at the date the Plaintiff DISCOVERED OR WITH THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE DUE DILIGENCE SHOULD HAVE DISCOVERED the infringement.  That is the key.  If you are a professional infringement Plaintiff and make representations on your website such as "we scour the internet every day to detect infringements," this representation could come back to bite you.

Legal argument (sample only, not legal advice)

Here is one argument I might make in a case like the above:

By waiting so long to sue (while apparently having logged this data), any lawsuit could be subject to a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings.  Courts often look to the sophistication of the Plaintiff and how well-seasoned they are at monitoring and detecting infringement in determining when the statute of limitations begins to run.  Saying “we just discovered it,” in other words, is not always on safe legal ground.  See Michael Grecco Prods., Inc. v. RADesign, Inc., No. 21 Civ. 8381 (S.D.N.Y.). 

Grecco is a Plaintiff who monitors and files infringement actions (much like Ansys does) and claimed he failed to spot the alleged infringement at issue until more than three years after the use began. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b).  Although the Court acknowledged that the discovery rule applied--meaning that the statute of limitations began to run when Grecco knew, or reasonably should have known, about the infringement, it nevertheless dismissed the case on statute of limitations grounds stating:

"Plaintiff's relative sophistication as an experienced litigator in identifying and bringing causes of action for unauthorized uses of Grecco's copyrighted works leads to the conclusion that it should have discovered, with the exercise of due diligence, that the Rose Photographs were posted within the three-year limitations period."

In so holding, the Court followed Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Buzzfeed Inc., 390 F. Supp. 3d 461 (S.D.N.Y.), in which a different S.D.N.Y. judge had dismissed a suit filed by Minden Pictures, another seasoned copyright plaintiff.

More about a Motion to Dismiss by Attorney Steve®

Contact a California copyright law firm.

While this defense may not always work, it is important to see if it might apply in your case.  Check the Plaintiff's website.  Are they making representations that they track and monitor the internet every day looking for infringements (for example, on Instagram, Facebook, company websites, TikTok, etc.)?  If so, it may be worth raising the argument.  If you need help in a copyright infringement matter, our California/Arizona-based law firm will likely be able to assist.  We have handled several hundred federal court litigations, and out-of-court settlement demands nearing 1,000 cases since 2004.  Call us at (877) 276-5084 or fill out our contact form for more information.

About the Author

Steve Vondran

Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise indicated. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Call us at (877) 276-5084. AZ Bar Lic. #025911 CA. Bar Lic. #232337

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!
The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran, P.C. BBB Business Review