Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Attorney Steve® Blog

Altium Software Audits

Posted by Steve Vondran | Oct 09, 2019 | 0 Comments

Software Audit Essentials - The Altium demand letter

Altium software audit BSA

Altium Joined the BSA in 2007

According to their website

"SYDNEY, Australia – June 6, 2007 – Altium Limited (ASX: ALU) industry-leading developer of unified electronic product development solutions, today announced it has joined the Business Software Alliance (BSA) as an Asian regional member. Membership of BSA gives Altium the opportunity to actively work with the highly respected body to assist in the reduction of software piracy and the education of the public about sound software management practices. Altium has previously been a BSA member in The People's Republic of China."

Does Altium Software file software piracy lawsuits?

We did find a case on the Federal Pacer system that shows Altium is willing to file a federal copyright infringement lawsuit.  So, this threat has to be taken serious.  Here are some sample allegations in one lawsuit I reviewed:

ALTIUM, LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff V. MICROVAST, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION.  

Case 4:19-cv-02831

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiff, Altium, LLC (“Plaintiff”), brings this action against Defendant, Microvast, Inc. (“Microvast”) or (“Defendant”), for copyright infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. By this Complaint, Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief, monetary damages, and attorney's fees under 17 U.S.C. §§ 106, 501, 502, 504 and 505, and alleges as follows:

Plaintiff is a corporation with a principal place of business located at 4225 Executive Square, Level 7, La Jolla, CA 92037. Plaintiff is the owner of three registrations for ALTIUM® Designer modular suite of software, including: U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX 8-415-448 (“ALTIUM® 448”); U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX 8-415-449 (“ALTIUM® 449”); and U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX 8-415-454 (“ALTIUM® 454”); hereinafter (“ALTIUM® Designer” or the “ALTIUM® Software”).

Plaintiff licenses the ALTIUM® Software to its customers. Customers may purchase single user licenses or multi-user licenses. In either case, the number of simultaneous users or end-users may not exceed the number of licenses purchased. Plaintiff prevents unauthorized access of the ALTIUM® Software through the use of a Security Mechanism. Plaintiff's license agreement states that customers are not allowed to use the ALTIUM® Software without the Security Mechanism, and that the ALTIUM® Software can detect the installation or use of illegal copies of the ALTIUM® Software and collect and transmit data about those illegal copies.

Software hackers reverse engineer the security mechanism and then provide processes and utilities to bypass the license enforcement in order to allow unauthorized use of the software. These processes and utilities mimic the license verification technology (i.e., keys, hardware devices, etc.) as a means to allow pirated software to function fully as legally purchased software. Software utilities that mimic the license verification technology are often referred to as “cracked” licenses. Software hackers may also create hacked versions of the software such that a license is not needed during installation.

Software that has been hacked or modified to use a cracked license may also contain malware that can damage computer systems, and/or infiltrate the computer network and the data on that network. In a report commissioned by the Business Software Alliance, the higher the pirated software rate in a country, the more malware generally encountered on computers in that country.2 Software that has been hacked may also not operate properly, negatively impacting the reputation of the software company that now has no oversight or control over the quality of the hacked versions of its software in use, and/or the products produced by that software

Piracy Detection and Reporting Security Software (PDRSS) exists to identify instances of pirated software in use and provides the identity and location of organizations utilizing the pirated software to the software providers. Identification of pirated software allows the software providers to take legal action against intentional software piracy, notify unwitting organizations of the illegal use of the software (and the potential malware problems that can accompany pirated software), and sell valid software licenses in the place of the previously illegally obtained software programs to recoup lost sales. Plaintiff identifies instances of pirated software in use through PDRSS which, along with the license verification technology, is a component of the Security Mechanism.

Reporting data from the embedded PDRSS includes a variety of information to identify the software that has been pirated and the organizations utilizing the pirated software, such as the version of the software being used, the license serial number, the Internet Protocol (IP) address of the organization where the pirated software is running, the identifying name of the computer, and a MAC address. Through the Security Mechanism, Plaintiff collects the aforementioned identifying information to determine when pirated and unlicensed versions of its ALTIUM® Software are being utilized.

Microvast is a Texas Corporation and promotes itself as a company that is a fastgrowing market leader in design, development and manufacturing of ultra-fast charging, longlife battery power systems with superior safety for electric vehicles. Specifically designed to address the critical constraints currently facing electric vehicle development, their electric vehicle battery system solution paves the way for mass adoption of electric vehicles. 30. Plaintiff has detected at least 234 instances of unauthorized access of the ALTIUM® Software by Defendant through the use of PDRSS.

On May 18, 2018, Meishan Piao, Global Compliance Director of Software Compliance Group (SCG), sent a letter to Mr. Yang Wu of Microvast on behalf of Plaintiff to notify him of the infringing use of ALTIUM® Software by Microvast. SCG did not receive a response from Mr. Wu or anyone else at Microvast to adequately address SCG's concerns.

Infringement of ALTIUM® Software Registration Number TX 8-415-448 (“ALTIUM® 448”) by Microvast, 17 U.S.C. §§ 106 and 501) 36. The Plaintiff incorporates the previous paragraphs of this Complaint by reference and re-alleges them as originally and fully set forth herein. 37. Microvast has knowingly and intentionally infringed, and continues to infringe ALTIUM® 448, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 38. As a direct and proximate consequence of Microvast's infringing acts, the Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer injury and damages, and unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continue to be injured in its business and property rights, and will suffer and continue to suffer injury and damages, which are causing irreparable harm and for which Plaintiff is entitled to relief.

Contact a BSA software audit defense law firm

We are one of the most experienced software audit defense firms in the United States,  Our boutique intellectual property firm is a leader in handling software audits from major software publishers such as Microsoft, CNC, Vero, Solidworks, Siemens, Adobe, Autodesk and the SIIA.  Contact us for a free initial consultation if you received an audit letter or notice of a federal court lawsuit.  One law firm that might be on the sending end of these demands is:

McInnes & McLane, LLP

9 Exchange Street

Worcester, MA  01608

We have experience dealing with this firm,  They can be very tough and have high settlement demands.  Our firm was established in 2004 and we have excellent references.  Call (877) 276-5084 or email us through our contact form.

About the Author

Steve Vondran

Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise indicated. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Call us at (877) 276-5084. AZ Bar Lic. #025911 CA. Bar Lic. #232337

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!

Menu