Contact Us Today! (877) 276-5084

Attorney Steve® Blog

NFTs Are Officially Protected Under Trademark Law: What the Yuga Labs Decision Means for Businesses, Creators, and NFT Brands

Posted by Steve Vondran | Jun 29, 2026

Vondran Legal® - Trademark College®. Trademarks in the Digital Age!

NFT trademarks

The digital asset marketplace continues to mature, and courts are increasingly being asked to answer important questions regarding ownership, branding, and intellectual property rights in the NFT ecosystem.

In a landmark decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently confirmed that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are protectable goods under the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks in the United States. The ruling represents a major victory for NFT creators, digital asset companies, and brands investing in Web3 technologies.

The case, Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ryder Ripps, sends a clear message: the same trademark rules that protect brands in the physical world apply equally in the digital world.

The Rise of NFT Brands

NFTs exploded in popularity following the launch of Yuga Labs' famous Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) collection. While many viewed NFTs simply as digital artwork, BAYC demonstrated that NFTs could become powerful brands, communities, and commercial ecosystems.

Owners of BAYC NFTs received more than artwork. Ownership provided access to exclusive events, memberships, networking opportunities, and other valuable benefits.

As BAYC gained mainstream recognition, its names, logos, and branding became valuable intellectual property assets.

The Legal Dispute

Artists Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen launched a competing NFT collection known as RR/BAYC, using similar names, logos, and imagery associated with Yuga Labs' BAYC project.

Yuga Labs sued for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and related claims.

The defendants argued that NFTs should not receive trademark protection because they are intangible digital assets rather than physical products.

Why the Ninth Circuit Rejected That Argument

The Ninth Circuit disagreed.

The court recognized that NFTs function as commercial goods in the marketplace because they:

  • Are actively bought and sold

  • Carry economic value

  • Are associated with identifiable brands

  • Can provide real-world benefits and memberships

  • Serve as unique digital assets authenticated through blockchain technology

The court emphasized that NFTs are not merely digital content. Instead, they are unique blockchain-based ownership records that consumers purchase and trade.

As a result, trademarks used in connection with NFTs perform the same source-identifying function as trademarks used for traditional products and services.

What This Means for NFT Projects

The decision confirms that NFT creators and digital asset companies should take intellectual property protection seriously.

If you are building an NFT project, your:

  • Project name

  • Collection name

  • Logos

  • Slogans

  • Brand identity

  • Community identifiers

  • Marketplace branding

may all qualify for valuable trademark protection.

Likewise, companies entering the NFT space should carefully evaluate existing trademarks before launching new collections or digital asset offerings.

The Metaverse Is Not a Trademark-Free Zone

One of the most important takeaways from the case is that courts are increasingly unwilling to treat the metaverse, blockchain ecosystems, and NFT marketplaces as legal gray areas.

The basic principles remain unchanged:

  • Don't infringe another company's trademarks.

  • Protect your own brand assets.

  • Monitor copycat projects.

  • Register trademarks before disputes arise.

  • Enforce your rights when necessary.

The same rules that apply to traditional commerce generally apply to digital commerce.

NFT Legal Services Offered by Vondran Legal®

At Vondran Legal®, we help NFT creators, blockchain entrepreneurs, artists, technology companies, and digital asset investors navigate the evolving legal landscape.

Our NFT and Web3 legal services include:

NFT Trademark Registration

  • NFT collection trademark searches

  • Trademark clearance opinions

  • Federal trademark applications

  • Brand portfolio development

  • International trademark strategies

NFT Copyright Protection

  • Copyright registration of digital artwork

  • Copyright ownership analysis

  • Licensing agreements

  • Work-for-hire agreements

  • DMCA takedown enforcement

NFT Project Development

  • NFT terms of service

  • Marketplace terms and conditions

  • Licensing structures

  • Intellectual property audits

  • Risk assessments

NFT Enforcement and Litigation

  • Trademark infringement disputes

  • Copyright infringement claims

  • NFT counterfeit investigations

  • Cease-and-desist letters

  • Federal litigation support

Web3 Business Consulting

  • Brand development strategies

  • IP portfolio management

  • Creator economy legal guidance

  • Blockchain commercialization strategies

  • Digital asset risk management

Protect Your NFT Brand Before Problems Arise

The Yuga Labs decision demonstrates that NFT projects can develop significant brand value—and that value deserves legal protection.

Whether you are launching a new NFT collection, expanding into Web3, or seeking to protect an established digital asset brand, early legal planning can help prevent costly disputes down the road.

The future of commerce increasingly includes blockchain-based assets, and businesses that take intellectual property protection seriously will be in the strongest position to succeed.

Need NFT Legal Assistance?

Attorney Steve® and the team at Vondran Legal® assist clients nationwide with NFT trademark protection, copyright registration, brand enforcement, licensing agreements, and intellectual property litigation.

Schedule a consultation today to discuss your NFT, Web3, blockchain, or digital asset legal needs.

About the Author

Steve Vondran
Steve Vondran

Thank you for viewing our blogs, videos and podcasts. As noted, all information on this website is Attorney Advertising. Decisions to hire an attorney should never be based on advertising alone. Any past results discussed herein do not guarantee or predict any future results. All blogs are written by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise indicated. Our firm handles a wide variety of intellectual property and entertainment law cases from music and video law, Youtube disputes, DMCA litigation, copyright infringement cases involving software licensing disputes (ex. BSA, SIIA, Siemens, Autodesk, Vero, CNC, VB Conversion and others), torrent internet file-sharing (Strike 3 and Malibu Media), California right of publicity, TV Signal Piracy, and many other types of IP, piracy, technology, and social media disputes. Call us at (877) 276-5084. AZ Bar Lic. #025911 CA. Bar Lic. #232337

Contact us for an initial consultation!

For more information, or to discuss your case or our experience and qualifications please contact us at (877) 276-5084. Please note that our firm does not represent you unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed, and any applicable legal fees are paid. All initial conversations are general in nature. Free consultations are limited to time and availability of counsel and will depend on the type of case you are calling about (no free consultations for other lawyers). All users and potential clients are bound by our Terms of Use Policies. We look forward to working with you!
The Law Offices of Steven C. Vondran, P.C. BBB Business Review

Menu