May 2021 Strike 3 Lawsuit Filings in Northern District of California - We can help you settle your case ANONYMOUSLY!!
November 2021 BitTorrent Litigation Update: Strike 3 continues to fire off copyright infringement lawsuits in all 4 districts of California including the Southern, Eastern, Central and many in the Northern District of California (where many IT professionals, software engineers and other technology workers are located). This is done through their geo-location technology that helps them pinpoint where the potential "John Doe" defendants are located, and even though many are located in California bay area, Strike 3 often starts their pursuit of online infringers in a "Bill of Discovery" in Miami-Dade County in Florida. Even if those cases result in the subpoena being "quashed" we have noted that many California residents will continue to be pursued in California federal district courts up and down the state. In California, there is no other firm that has represented more clients as the image below shows. In we have recently been identified by Unicourt as the top copyright infringement defense firm nationwide, that has handled copyright infringement defense cases, per number of cases.
Introduction
Here are some of the recent federal copyright infringement lawsuit filings (illegal file sharing) in the Northern District of California. If you received a subpoena notice from your ISP with a cutoff date to respond, call us at (877) 276-5084.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.50.1.161,
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.53.222.241
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.217.160.26
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.251.2.114
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 162.226.173.100
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.4.191.76,
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.4.198.218
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.198.67
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.78.203.52
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 69.215.150.143
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.136.136.171
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.202.224.35
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.252.104
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.223.82.123
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 75.11.10.30
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 162.227.165.148
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 162.229.191.99
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 23.116.43.54
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 23.123.141.3
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.231.127
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.174.205.103
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 68.251.62.218
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 69.149.42.98
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.143.196.166
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.202.31.68
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.222.22.136
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.71.131.110
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.71.188.156
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 76.126.13.43
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.234.210.119
Vondran Legal Extensive BitTorrent Defense Law Firm Experience
Here is a look at the number of cases we have handled in California. It is good to have a local counsel help you if you are a California resident in the event motions have to be filed, and personal appearance is required by the judge. In many cases, for example, an attorney from Texas, New York, Florida, or Chicago, Illinois may not be able to represent your needs if the case evolves. For example, if the case were to move to a "motion to dismiss" because Plaintiff cannot show the proper "additional evidence" per the Cobbler case highlighted below.
The "Cobbler Case"
VIDEO: Click to watch this important BitTorrent file-sharing video. Learn more about an important case that can affect your Strike3 settlement if you live or work in California. Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to join over 32,000 others who love our legal videos. We have over 3.5 MILLION VIDEO VIEWS!!!
Remember, in the 9th Circuit (ex. Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, Montana, Oregon) the "Cobbler case" applies. This means, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC cannot proceed with a federal court lawsuit JUST BECAUSE you are the named subscriber to an internet account (ex. a Cox or Comcast subscriber). They are required to show "additional evidence" that at least raises an inference that the SUBSCRIBER is also the INFRINGER. If they cannot do this, a motion to dismiss the lawsuit may be proper, and in fact, lawsuits have been ostensibly dismissed for this very reason.
Interestingly, we just had a competitor from Chicago try to obtain one of our domain names in a WIPO domain dispute (but failed miserably). You should factor this in when deciding your choice of copyright counsel.
Call us if you received a letter or a subpoena notice (with deadline) from your Internet Service Provider).
We offer a free initial consultation. We have been in business since 2004 and have glowing 5-star reviews from our past clients.
We can be reached at (877) 276-5084 or email us through our contact form. Check out our Avvo reviews.
We look forward to serving you.
